A program partners actually want to join.
Affiliates talk. Word travels faster in this vertical than in any other, and it travels in private Telegram groups you'll never see. A program with vague NGR deductions, silent negative carryover or a manager who replies in four days will be publicly known as such within a month.
Most failed affiliate programs didn't fail at recruitment. They failed at terms.
The partners who actually send quality traffic will never test you again once your reputation is set. So we fix the terms first and the recruitment second — in that order, always.
Four things we fix.
We write definitions that leave nothing to interpretation: what's deducted, when carryover resets, how chargebacks and bonus costs are treated.
You launched a program and nobody joined.
Because your offer was average and your reputation was unknown. We fix the terms first and the recruitment second — in that order, always.
Your top affiliates left and nobody knows why.
Usually a deduction they didn't expect, a payment that arrived late twice, or a manager who stopped answering. We run exit conversations and fix the cause, not the symptom.
Your terms create a dispute every single month.
Because "NGR" is defined loosely enough that both sides can read it differently. We write definitions that leave nothing to interpretation.
You can't tell which partners send real players.
Tracking gaps, no sub-ID granularity, no fraud monitoring. We rebuild the tracking chain and add traffic-quality scoring so you can renegotiate from evidence.
What you get.
Terms written to prevent disputes rather than win them.
No hidden negative carryover. Not out of sentiment.
We won't design a program built on negative carryover the partner isn't clearly told about, or on deductions written to be missed. It's a bad commercial strategy: programs with that reputation pay more for worse traffic within a year.
Send us your current affiliate terms.
We'll flag the three clauses most likely to be costing you partners.
Send your terms